Fais ceci si tu ne veux plus jamais perdre ta voie | Laetitia Martos, Self Leadership | Saison 5

On aborde le sujet qui fâche et qui libère: arrêter de se trahir. La conversation fouille l’honnêteté radicale, ce moment où l’on cesse de maquiller ses envies pour prendre des décisions nettes, même quand elles coûtent. On explore la responsabilité totale de l’entrepreneur, la tentation des compromis qui “fonctionnent”, et la manière d’agir sans attendre une clarté parfaite sur le futur. Comme des phares dans la nuit, on n’éclaire que les prochains 300 mètres, puis les suivants, et c’est suffisant pour avancer.

Je raconte pourquoi j’ai coupé un programme rentable malgré des clients ravis, et comment ce choix a rouvert de l’espace pour ce qui sonne juste. On distingue vérité et brutalité: dire le vrai ne signifie pas mettre en péril la relation amoureuse, les enfants ou les finances. Il s’agit de parler clair et d’agir avec tact. On revient aussi aux détails du quotidien qui sculptent le caractère: ce que l’on achète, ce que l’on met dans son corps, la lumière qu’on demande, la petite chose qu’on refuse. Ces gestes ancrent un self-leadership concret et entraînent le courage dont on aura besoin pour les grands virages.

Le cœur du message tient en une phrase: le plus grand risque est de vivre la vie de quelqu’un d’autre et de s’en rendre compte trop tard. On propose une pratique simple et exigeante: nommer ce qui est évident maintenant, décider, nourrir la décision, puis voter chaque jour avec ses actes. Si tu te reconnais dans la recherche de clarté interminable, dans le “ça marche mais ce n’est pas moi”, cette écoute remettra de l’alignement au centre. Abonne-toi, partage l’épisode avec une personne qui en a besoin, et laisse un avis pour soutenir le podcast: quel compromis vas-tu arrêter dès aujourd’hui?

Bienvenue dans LES AFFRANCHIS, le podcast des audacieux qui osent bâtir leur propre modèle de réussite.

Je suis Laetitia, entrepreneure, ambitieuse et libre. Depuis 12 ans, je guide les bâtisseurs atypiques, les ambitieux et les esprits libres à transformer leur vie en véritables œuvres d’art.

Si tu veux bâtir une vie où beauté et simplicité se rencontrent pour laisser un héritage puissant – pour toi, tes enfants et le collectif – alors tu es au bon endroit.

Chapters

• 0:00 Accueil Et Intention Du Jour
• 4:33 Simplicité De La Vie Vs Facilité
• 5:38 Responsabilité Totale De L’Entrepreneur
• 11:13 Compromis Et Manque D’Honnêteté
• 16:23 Exemplarité Et Alignement Personnel
• 21:58 Recherche De Clarté Et Métaphore Des Phares
• 28:13 Dire La Vérité Sans Mettre En Péril L’Essentiel

Transcript

SPEAKER_00: 1:50

I tell Letitia Martos and if it's the first time that you regard, I'd invite me a message for personally. And if it's one, two, three, cinch, three years that you regard, I also and recipe infinitely for your fidelity after all these days. Only we will talk about the theme of your view, your view with a, your chemist, and your view with an X, and especially with that question coming to not perhaps your way with an E and an X. I don't think accompanying, I aid and my care to aid the people to reprint their self-leadership, their capacity to decide what is bad for them, what are their domain of view, with verity, with honnêteth radical. I am render of a impressionant, our capacity, we the people, to compromise, of our capacity to oblige, of our capacity to detour of our proper chemistry. There's an expression that I think even in fact the life is very simple. I don't know that it is facile, but it is simple. And I repeat all the time this phrase during 10, 11, 12, 13 years, because it meant that at the time of the moment where we pronounce that phrase, this is a thing that is not facility, but which is extremely simple. And we'll come back. It's like the people with which I am entoured, they're really entrepreneurs because it's a career professional particular person who does the man completely life to decide our life. It's like the prise of decision when you are entrepreneur, it is total. It is total, it is a million percent, it is extremely responsible, because all the decisions we bring, we obtain the fruits, or that's what I am. I adore the responsibility that is requirement and self-leadership, particularly applicated to the entrepreneurial, but to all the projects that demand to entrepreneurship that are of us. And so I realized a few years of these days that our capacity to fuck, to compromise, one, it is of our manque of honnêteth over them. And for me, it's a suit that is extremely difficult to abord, because the people never meet because at a moment I compromise, parce que at a moment I've had this realisation. At a moment, no. I could say that I've in two, in all my life, a seven experiences, totally. Because we are regarded. We are regarded by our people, by our clients, by our people, by our four, by our banks. We are regarded evidently by our family, by the people who partage our life, our people. And this exemplarity is not uniquely in our actions, it is in the honnêting that we have with us, to realize not what it is, but what is evident for us the moment we feel. The two is that one that we are happy with them, and this will arrive in all the domains of the life. Alright, I have a girl who utilise the faith entrepreneurial to work with me, for me, their leadership, their charisms. But it's not divisive, we are not different at the moment in our entrepreneur. And if we do, it should pose a question. The idea is that we redeven unified. But the view has for a point to be comprised. It has for a bit to be. Excuse me, there are many concepts already, but at a moment you think we talk about the two, it's our capacity to agree. Agreed, it would be put a decision, it would be sure the decisions that we are put on the quick term, the long term, the long term. It's not that I put the decision, it's continuing to nourish the decision before it is pretty. After all that of that decision. In the cases, the part two has no importance, because we don't agree in manner just when they're not radically hate. We agree. Okay. But that is at the end of this that I've read in my education, it is what I could do for long, it is at the end of certain experiences that I could find. And when I rest, it's not how I am hurt, it's when I rest radically hate with me, and I put a decision, I put one, and I continue to put to vote. I think that it's like that we vote, with a vote for our comportment, for what we partake, it's like we have an impact to realize what we say just for us. And if you feel that, if you're radically honest with what you do and you say what you're, you don't have to clartet, you want the food or of courage if you apply like that. You want the courage to do your life. I've passed a year on this. It's really the world that I'm an expert, I have an MBA in gestion of entrepreneurs, I have two master in marketing digital market, I work with Apple at Social in Europe. I was in an environment extremely extremely academic, technical, and theoretically. I have my hundred clients that I've accompanied. And you don't want to be a clarty. You want a puta pair to assume what you mean and so that demands your courage, that you appear like you can, I say, if that would be, you don't have to make the courage. Because when I talk about my clients in private, just like they say what they do, almost after signaling their contrat with me, they said that it was close. Person has clarty. If you want to clartet, you want to have a clarty about how to make to arrive at your feet. But you saw a few and a moment. And I don't know that example of the lumière that the night, you say, in your voice, the phares. You make the phards, you're with your amount, you are the night, tu allumes tes phards to dare. They won't éclair, I don't know, 300 meters from toi. And in a moment, they're the 300 meters suivant. So if effectively you cherish the clarty absolute to éclair to the chemistry to your butt, that arrivera jamais. It's like the pharma in the night. You can see the agreement, when you realize, the grand mode on the resources between the feminine and the masculine. It's a bullshit, it's not that. We have two. And not to no matter what. No. And please say in English, the truth. Rien. On ne mettra pas notre relation amoureuse in this danger là. On n'y met pas notre relation with our enfants, no relationship with our finances. No, it's not of that. That's not a question of what it is, what it cooked. And I'm certain that discourse you live for lunch after the pandemic, and you tell you, but no, in fact, it's not what it could. And now you would make this propos in the view that you're enjoying, that sounds surrealist. Just respect to what in having connaissance of a chance to put a decision, but in écoutant when you're enjoying the children. Imagine at the end of you, you've construced, for example, an entrepreneur, the project marks plutôt very well, but you think they're applying to other children. You see an elder that you say, Putain, it's bad what I've done. I am an example of that. It's bad what I've done, it marks, what I've done, that's 10 000, 15 000, 50 000 euros per month, plus. But that's the mojo, there's the truth. A pet papillon that goes, Putain the merde, come on the life. And that can arrive, you're not going to attend 50 000 euros per month. That would arrive when you gain to not have the lamps. Vas-y, that happens, that happens, that's it. Okay, but I've created a program in not very long, in two, three years exceptional, where you have to do it in my parkour academic, which has the value because I experimented, I tour with my esprit delicious, transmit with atypicity, with profondeur, and pertinence. I've ajouté to my experience, my vision, she ajoutes that I did in the milieu of business and verity. And you could comment with her properity. And I applied the cerveau deliciously different, and it's comment application to create some business when it is a cerveau deliciously different. And a journey I sent that finished. Okay. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Surtout because I have a client enchanted. Surtout because she's appearing together. And that will liberate a place for anything that will arrive, which is pertinent as me, maybe a little bit more pertinent than me. And that it is to put an action and sit on the internet and to render invisible, to supprime the formation, to supprime it, or to do it together, to make a cadeau. It's important this conversation. It's not okay, it's clear, and it will be too bad. It's a little like the vélo. And in a moment, you perceive that if you arrest the pédalation, it rules too. But you're pédallated at the end. And it's really that I'm partake. And performance is there on your veto and you say, Why do you have that? It's good. It wants. Ah, purely, it's not so difficult that I imagine. That's right, but I think that it's right. I think it's just. Ah okay. Because the honnêteting is radical, we obtain so for the plant and to not écout, and to put the gueule with more decisions, so because we need to do what we do just for us in all the things. When I say in those things, it's all. When you have a client, an amigan, you see, I could partake my sentiments. Is that pretty what I think for you? When you have the viande, you're prevented to achieve the poolet, in the truck, and you say, I think. Neither. And when you utilise, you say, Putain, it's really, but it's not possible. There's these odd. You see the perturbate, endocrinic, please, and you say, No, I've ached it. No, no, no, you can achieve the paper toilet. Because it's in all the things that you can compromise. And you can see if you compromise in a big thing, the source you have previously carottes, and when you're in the platform, you have enough to manage the carottes, mange other. If the lumière, you don't have any lumière on plafond for manager, and if you're with these amounts, demand another lumière. Because it's like that their proper chemin. I don't want to change to march my chemist. And when you feel that you never perhaps with an E and your X. And I could say, even if you're fatigued, I will have this live. I will partake this live. I have two years of retract here at Ibisa where I have. Okay? Evidently, but two years ago concretely, one year after. And pendant I was a damagement imprisoned totally, in a circumstances inimaginable. I am not because no matter what, and you're fatigued and you're not reason, but it's not no matter what, it's because I say that the message is very important. Let's see, and I press the time to go, because there's no important that I traverses the moment where it traverses. And so that means when you're not traveling, I feel just to compromise that. And this is the base of leadership. Alright, the leadership, we have the guess, the leadership, version alpha. It's really the leader, who made the troops. We are listening in the self-leadership, the capacity to lead to them. And that comes by the reality. The reality at toi. But to see exactly what you want. That's our base. About what? To the rest is possible. Franchement, go find the quiz that I've got, it does your profile. It does a toilet l'araignée, a radar, on don't want a configuration rapid. After I have a video for each element, if you want to ameliorate your leadership, franchise, it's libre to accept. I'm my part. I'm my part for. And I lead my life from that and I aid to get the accompanying, it's a bullshit. I'm accompanying it, I'm in my view. Although we say that the world is not and the machine, but you are posted that question. Il n'existe aucun risque plus grand que celui de vivre la vie que tu as là sur le chemin de quelqu'un d'autre. Et de te retourner à 80 ans et de te dire merde. En fait, j'ai marché le chemin de quelqu'un d'autre. Le risque que toi, petit ou petite, tu te dis bah t'as une vie de merde, en fait. C'est ça le risque. Imagine if your enfant of 7-8 anses, Putain ta vie! Eh bah tu envoies bois, that's bad. You told me to go. Almost, not like the others. You can see what you say, but it's like that the life. We can choose. We don't know what we want. And we have a responsibility, we in Occident, because we have the chance to do a lot of things that we do. Pas two, it's right, but a child compared to others. Especially because I am a father, and because I was a fan in Occident, near Europe, in France, blanche. And for that, and I don't know enough to please, I've got a responsibility. And that's right. And it's not very. I've had an episode on that, on the fact that we don't want to. It's not right. There's a truth on the internet, we have to. No, we don't want to, we don't want the misery, we don't have the poverty, we don't want the violence, we don't want to. It's important what to say that phrase. It's a non-sens. We have two, three things and combination, although we don't have personal combination. It's all, it's not very complicated. It's simple, but it's not facility. Partage. Not because it's me, but because the message does pass. If you want to go, I'll have the space for you, to accue. You know, the way I is extremely simple. I'm at your service. It's simple. Three solutions for me, three of tariffs that have strictly the ones with the other, which are very, very in manner very large at least. There are a two prize, and there are a prize for the elegance, for the millimeters. I attend in my space, you contact the word, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, my internet. You enjoy a fumeless. Fellow. Because in eight years it's too tight. You don't regret that, it's not possible. You're not attending.